<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Secularists don&#8217;t have to Speak up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sandeepweb.com/2004/04/16/secularists-dont-have-to-speak-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2004/04/16/secularists-dont-have-to-speak-up/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darpan</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2004/04/16/secularists-dont-have-to-speak-up/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Darpan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://204.11.51.228/~sandeep/wp/?p=65#comment-361</guid>
		<description>Look at my comment in the other thread likening the Prannoy Roys and Shekhar Guptas to "cowards on the street but wife-beaters at home". 

After posting it, I got to thinking that that was not my original idea, that it must have been triggered by something I read somewhere. Further probing reveals that, sure it was.

Here is what triggered my thought, and paradoxically it was the on the Hussain controversy:

&lt;a href="http://forumhub.com/indhistory/1020.19.58.37.html" rel="nofollow"&gt; Weak to the Strong, Strong to the Weak &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at my comment in the other thread likening the Prannoy Roys and Shekhar Guptas to &#8220;cowards on the street but wife-beaters at home&#8221;. </p>
<p>After posting it, I got to thinking that that was not my original idea, that it must have been triggered by something I read somewhere. Further probing reveals that, sure it was.</p>
<p>Here is what triggered my thought, and paradoxically it was the on the Hussain controversy:</p>
<p><a href="http://forumhub.com/indhistory/1020.19.58.37.html" rel="nofollow"> Weak to the Strong, Strong to the Weak </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2004/04/16/secularists-dont-have-to-speak-up/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://204.11.51.228/~sandeep/wp/?p=65#comment-362</guid>
		<description>Sandeep, Don't miss this one 

http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl2108/stories/20040423007612700.htm

Vajpayee is now compared to Hitler.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandeep, Don&#8217;t miss this one </p>
<p><a href="http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl2108/stories/20040423007612700.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl2108/stories/20040423007612700.htm</a></p>
<p>Vajpayee is now compared to Hitler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raghu Reddy</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2004/04/16/secularists-dont-have-to-speak-up/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Raghu Reddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://204.11.51.228/~sandeep/wp/?p=65#comment-363</guid>
		<description>You have units to measure things. Watts for power. Fahrenheit and Celsius for temperature. dyne/cm^2 for pressure. Newtons for force. And so on.

I have a measurement system for sizing up leftwing lunatics. This unit is called "bidwai". A single bidwai is so power-packed that the overwhelming majority of leftwingers need a smaller scale of mesurement in order not to develop complexes. (In fact, a single bidwai is often called Fulla-bidwai.) To give a not so apt analogy: would you step in a jewellery shop that sold gold by the kilogram? 

Hence: millibidwais. "45.75 millibidwais", "127 millibidwais", etc. N. Ram for example measures at 329 millibidwais. Prem Shankar Jha of Outlook started at 122 millibidwais, but he has been gaining bidwai-weight of late, and is currently weighing in at 323 millibidwais, only a notch below N.Ram. Arundhati Roy is a class apart, she is almost 970 millibidwais -- which is as good as a Fulla-bidwai! Dilip D'Souza, who used to publish in Rediff, peaked at 677.45 millibidwais once, his personal record that unfortunately he has not been able to attain again. Age is catching up with Kuldip Nayar: better times have seen him posting a decent 155 millibidwais. 

If you know people who have impressive vital stats -- in the bidwai dimension -- please do let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have units to measure things. Watts for power. Fahrenheit and Celsius for temperature. dyne/cm^2 for pressure. Newtons for force. And so on.</p>
<p>I have a measurement system for sizing up leftwing lunatics. This unit is called &#8220;bidwai&#8221;. A single bidwai is so power-packed that the overwhelming majority of leftwingers need a smaller scale of mesurement in order not to develop complexes. (In fact, a single bidwai is often called Fulla-bidwai.) To give a not so apt analogy: would you step in a jewellery shop that sold gold by the kilogram? </p>
<p>Hence: millibidwais. &#8220;45.75 millibidwais&#8221;, &#8220;127 millibidwais&#8221;, etc. N. Ram for example measures at 329 millibidwais. Prem Shankar Jha of Outlook started at 122 millibidwais, but he has been gaining bidwai-weight of late, and is currently weighing in at 323 millibidwais, only a notch below N.Ram. Arundhati Roy is a class apart, she is almost 970 millibidwais &#8212; which is as good as a Fulla-bidwai! Dilip D&#8217;Souza, who used to publish in Rediff, peaked at 677.45 millibidwais once, his personal record that unfortunately he has not been able to attain again. Age is catching up with Kuldip Nayar: better times have seen him posting a decent 155 millibidwais. </p>
<p>If you know people who have impressive vital stats &#8212; in the bidwai dimension &#8212; please do let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JK</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2004/04/16/secularists-dont-have-to-speak-up/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://204.11.51.228/~sandeep/wp/?p=65#comment-364</guid>
		<description>Raghu, Others are Sitaram Yechuri, Harkishen Singh Surjeet, Achutanandan, Anitha Pratap...But none of them are Fulla-Bidwais.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raghu, Others are Sitaram Yechuri, Harkishen Singh Surjeet, Achutanandan, Anitha Pratap&#8230;But none of them are Fulla-Bidwais.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alka</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2004/04/16/secularists-dont-have-to-speak-up/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>alka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://204.11.51.228/~sandeep/wp/?p=65#comment-365</guid>
		<description>Alka and Shanti, here's your much-awaited answer.
Saneeeeeep!!!!!!!
Come on these voices are fastists' voices in your comment box. I am asking for secularists' voices!!!
:-) :-) :-) :-) :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alka and Shanti, here&#8217;s your much-awaited answer.<br />
Saneeeeeep!!!!!!!<br />
Come on these voices are fastists&#8217; voices in your comment box. I am asking for secularists&#8217; voices!!! <img src='http://www.sandeepweb.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> :-) <img src='http://www.sandeepweb.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> :-) <img src='http://www.sandeepweb.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2004/04/16/secularists-dont-have-to-speak-up/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://204.11.51.228/~sandeep/wp/?p=65#comment-366</guid>
		<description>Darpan,

I've read Arun Shourie's "Weak to the Strong..." and it's very apt. 

Raghu Reddy,

But of course, no one except Arundhati Roy can come close to Bidwai. But she's in a different league. 

Alka,

Like Darpan says, the secularists will not speak up. They have been saved by Hussain :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darpan,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read Arun Shourie&#8217;s &#8220;Weak to the Strong&#8230;&#8221; and it&#8217;s very apt. </p>
<p>Raghu Reddy,</p>
<p>But of course, no one except Arundhati Roy can come close to Bidwai. But she&#8217;s in a different league. </p>
<p>Alka,</p>
<p>Like Darpan says, the secularists will not speak up. They have been saved by Hussain <img src='http://www.sandeepweb.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravikiran</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2004/04/16/secularists-dont-have-to-speak-up/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravikiran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://204.11.51.228/~sandeep/wp/?p=65#comment-367</guid>
		<description>I strongly protest the rating given to the verbal terrorist. 
In the first place it is too low. If anyone exceeds 1 bidwai, it is she. I propose that 1 Kilo Bidwai equal 1 Roy.

Secondly of course, the full range of her lunacy cannot be captured in one dimension. It will have to be a vector in n-dimensional space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strongly protest the rating given to the verbal terrorist.<br />
In the first place it is too low. If anyone exceeds 1 bidwai, it is she. I propose that 1 Kilo Bidwai equal 1 Roy.</p>
<p>Secondly of course, the full range of her lunacy cannot be captured in one dimension. It will have to be a vector in n-dimensional space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2004/04/16/secularists-dont-have-to-speak-up/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://204.11.51.228/~sandeep/wp/?p=65#comment-368</guid>
		<description>LOL Ravi! (laughing uncontrollably). What if I say that her lunacy is ultra-dimensional?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL Ravi! (laughing uncontrollably). What if I say that her lunacy is ultra-dimensional?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shanti</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2004/04/16/secularists-dont-have-to-speak-up/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Shanti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://204.11.51.228/~sandeep/wp/?p=65#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Sandeep, being a secularist means "you never have to say you are sorry"! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandeep, being a secularist means &#8220;you never have to say you are sorry&#8221;! <img src='http://www.sandeepweb.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2004/04/16/secularists-dont-have-to-speak-up/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://204.11.51.228/~sandeep/wp/?p=65#comment-370</guid>
		<description>It's simple for the secularist: like after the election defeating Kerry, God makes me angry for Peace, and what's more irrationally. Irrationalism belongs to MAN for hidden peices to the puzzle from where "the wind blows".
God decended the whole connected Rationale and I believe it is objective, many ways I believe with a relative essence to the nature of the God given world. It angers that we be less opinionated, at the same time that we sense religions were some way meant to be at ODDS.
Hey, ODD is good: EVEN is bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s simple for the secularist: like after the election defeating Kerry, God makes me angry for Peace, and what&#8217;s more irrationally. Irrationalism belongs to MAN for hidden peices to the puzzle from where &#8220;the wind blows&#8221;.<br />
God decended the whole connected Rationale and I believe it is objective, many ways I believe with a relative essence to the nature of the God given world. It angers that we be less opinionated, at the same time that we sense religions were some way meant to be at ODDS.<br />
Hey, ODD is good: EVEN is bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
