Francois Gautier is a very passionate Hindu/supporter of Hinduism. In his latest piece, he recounts his experiences of exhibiting a show/photographs about Kashmiri Pandits.
Earlier, the exhibition was also held at Brent Town hall, Wembley, on June 27, and at the Clyde hall, Scottish Exhibition & Conference Centre, Glasgow three days earlier.
Unfortunately, in spite of a good crowd, the results were not up to expectations.
First, where were the 200,000 Hindus from London and the 700,000 who live in the UK? As usual, most Hindus abroad only look after themselves, giving their children a thorough Western education and ensuring thus that they are lost forever to India. I even saw an Indian man turn his heels as soon as he saw it was something on terrorism and another woman tell me: “Don’t you think it is RSS and BJP?”
We also witnessed firsthand the basic hostility of Amnesty International to the plight of Kashmiri Pandits. Sunil Bakshi had repeatedly sent invitations to them three weeks before the exhibition. I personally called the head of Kashmir at Amnesty International several times as well as Ingrid Massage, the director, Asia & Pacific Program of Amnesty. First she told us they only reported on first hand facts, I replied these were photographs and statistics which nobody could dispute. Finally, after ten phone calls, she said she had too many files on her desk and that she had no time to come, although the exhibtion was a few blocks from her office. So much for Amnesty’s sense of justice.
This is the same Amnesty International which is first to take up cudgels when the Prophet’s beloved children are harmed in any way, never mind the fact that they instigated the reaction. The same goes for the media. Political correctness in today’s world has long ago crossed the boundary of ridiculousness.
I understood also that in the West, journalists don’t go by facts, do not substantiate their writings by on the ground reporting and search for truth beyond preconceived ideas. No, they go by the politically correct, by what is said at the moment, or what is in fashion in Leftist and intellectual circles. This is not true journalism, this is the worst kind of conceited journalism.
The sad thing is that journalists in turn influence the public at large, so that many of my friends in Europe — good, sincere people — repeat with great conviction things which they do not understand and which are not based on facts: “Hindus are fundamentalists.”
The last para worries me: the peddlers of Political Correctness go by the current fashion of the day, which happens to be silence in reply to Islamic fundamentalist acts, and derogation of Hindus and Hinduism. What can be more insane than the media reaction to the Sept 11 incident? Reams of paper went into condemning the US for having “invited” disaster upon themselves! Yet, this is the same logic that the Indian press uses when Hindus are attacked in their own country: you invited it, who asked you to take a public procession to celebrate the Ganesha/Krishna/Rama festival?
In the end you are left with the realisation that nobody cares about the Kashmiri Pandits, neither abroad nor in India. They are too small a community to constitute a voting bank. They also don’t make their voices heard: they don’t blow up buses full of innocent civilians and don’t fire Kalashnikovs at crowds and, of course, they themselves are a disunited lot and except for a few beings like Sunil Bakshi or Ashok Pandit, nobody sticks his or her neck out.
A part me thinks that what has happened in Kashmir–where the original inhabitants have all but been driven out–can happen to the rest of India if this wretched disease of political correctness continues, if people in greater numbers don’t speak up against it. A part of me also thinks that Pakistan has been able to make inroads into Kashmir because of its proxmity to it. Had Pakistan surrounded us from all sides, in all four directions, it is a safe bet that they’d divide and direct their energies from all four directions, creating Kashmir-like situations in all such states.
Tags: Pseudo Secularism Hall of Shame, Terrorism & Pakistan
Dear Seriously Sandeep,
Wouldn’t you care to respond to this that I put on your Aug 5 blog? Or is that too hard?
cordially,
dilip d’souza.
—
Someone just pointed me to this, forgive my six-month-old reply. I put this on your old blogsite, but I guess you don’t check that any more.
You say:
> There was a similar case during the Mumbai
> (Bombay) Blasts, (little) known as the
> Jogeshwari massacre/Radhabai Chawl massacre,
> where many Hindu families were locked up from
> the outside and roasted alive by Muslim
> miscreants. How many know this?
The better question, reading these lines, has got be this: What do YOU know about this?
One: The Bombay blasts happened on March 12, 1993. The Radhabai Chawl massacre happened on the night of January 7/8, 1993. Therefore, it would be very interesting to learn from you how the massacre happened “during” the blasts that followed over two months later.
Two: One, not “many”, Hindu family was locked up and roasted alive by Muslim miscreants. A crime horrible enough that it doesn’t need to be inflated to “many” families.
Three: Radhabai Chawl is hardly “little” known. The Shiv Sena regularly points to it as the spark of the Bombay riots. Which is itself a lie, because the riots went on all through December 1992, but no matter — the point is that it is known. It figures prominently in the Srikrishna report on the riots. A dude who asks of it “How many know this?” only puts on display his own ignorance.
Lastly, it would be interesting to hear from you why you appear to believe that “one’s own culture and heritage” don’t include what you call “negatives”.
cordially,
dilip d’souza.
Dilip D’Souza [dilipd@rediff.co.in gone defunct, dilipdsouza@rediffmail.com works]
comment added :: 31st July 2004, 21:40 GMT+05:30
Hey man .. Francois Gautier does write well, and he makes a good point here. Me thinks he has written abt the Kashmiri Pundits before too. He has stayed in India for a lot of yrs and I would say understands the whole system nicely. This article in particular illustrates that fact.
Also, you are now on my blogroll. Just to let u know.
Hello dear Dilip D’Souza,
Howdy man. Popping up in an unlikely place like this!
Sandeep seems to have erred when it comes to the body count of those killed in Radhabai Chawl. Serious matter, no, isn’t it?
I grasp at the larger point you are driving, which I presume is this: a crime horrible enough doesn’t need to be embellished with fanciful detail.
Now I hear the figure of “2000″ being bandied about as the “unofficial” count of Muslims killed in Gujarat riots. Some claim even bigger figures, running up to 5000. The official figure IIRC is 900 dead, 250 of which are Hindu.
Bugs the hell out of you, no? Angers you that propangadists are exploiting a crime horrible enough for their own political puproses with bloated figures?
Outrages you, I guess, that one of the chief advocates of this figure happens to be a guy called Harsh Mander, who was actually severely castigated by the Press Council of India for doing precisely that which you abhor: embellishing horrible crimes with fictious details to make them sound even more horrible? Angers you, I suppose, that Mander, along with the Times of India, a rag that you no doubt like to see your stuff printed in, has such respect for democratic institutions that he treated the Council’s reprimand like a speck of dust?
Just curious.
Cheers,
Raghu Reddy
Welcome Home Everyone Home
Cya
Max