Read Balbir Punj’s take on it. Reproduced here in full, from the Pioneer.
Can Islam be democratic?
Balbir K Punj
Islam supercedes nationality,” says media mogul Rupert Murdoch. “You have to be careful about Muslims who have a very strong, in many ways a fine but very strong religion, which supercedes any sense of nationalism wherever they go,” he told Channel Nine. Mr Murdoch was present at a function in Sydney that described him as the most influential Australian of all times.
It was indeed a bold remark from the media baron, considering the fact that mainstream media is sickeningly “secular”. Is this an indicator of things to come? The Western media showed guts, even if misplaced, by republishing the cartoons of Prophet Mohammed in various newspapers across Europe, Israel, Australia and New Zealand. According to confidential sources, Prophet Mohammed’s cartoons were republished across newspapers to preempt a reaction from the Islamic world.
The Western intelligentsia is increasingly becoming aware of the danger that West (along with rest of the world) faces from Islam. Niall Fergusson and Mark Steyn anticipate civil war (like French riots last October) taking place in European cities as Muslim demography burgeons and European population senesces. European demography will be ill-prepared to meet an Islamic challenge in, say, 2020.
Mr Murdoch’s comments found one instant critic. Australian Federation of Islamic Council’s president Rahim Ghauri said that religion and nationality go hand in hand. “I am a Muslim, my religion is there, and nobody is there to stop me from praying five times a day and giving to charity,” he said, adding, “At the same time I must be faithful and loyal to my country.” He doubted Mr Murdoch’s knowledge of Islam, except what he has got through his media’s report. He has said that there should be no place for fundamentalism.
Mr Murdoch is no doubt Right-winger although he identifies himself as a libertarian. Once a supporter of Australian Labour Party, he switched preference to right-centrist Liberal Party of Australia in 1975. He was a friend of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. His papers supported President George Bush both in the 2000 and 2004 US elections. He is certainly no holy cow himself, and known for his partisan views in politics.
However, just as jihad is not merely an aberration but has its roots in Islamic theology, Mr Murdoch’s suspicion that “Islam supercedes nationality” is not a new invention. People as diverse as Viceroy of India Lord Mayo, poet Rabindranath Tagore, freedom activist Lala Lajpat Rai, social reformer BR Ambedkar have often suspected the same. Pan-Islamist poet Allama Iqbal wrote, “Chino Arab Hamara, Hindostan hamara, Muslim hain hum, watan hain sara jahan hamara.” These suspicions have a definite historical background, which had subsided from public view in the latter part of the 20th century when Islam had to scramble to fit itself in an altered world order. With that world order waning, Islam is threatening to stage its come back.
“Are the Indian Musalmans bound by their religion to rebel against the Queen?” was a question that troubled Lord Mayo, the Viceroy of India. The British had discovered that ring leaders of the 1857 uprising were Muslims, and were still grappling with the Wahabi movement (1820s-1870s) that sought to re-impose an Islamic state in India. Its result was the book, The Indian Musalmans (1871) by William Hunter. In the subsequent year, Lord Mayo was stabbed to death by one Sher Mohammed while he was inspecting the Cellular Jail in the Andamans. Sher Ali, although his Wahabi affiliation could never be proved, had exclaimed that he had killed Lord Mayo for the sake of ‘Muslims of India’.
Lala Lajpat Rai (1865-1928), the icon of nationalism who believed in Hindu-Muslim unity, was greatly agonised after 1924 Kohat riots (NWFP) where the small Hindu community was savaged. His sense of alarm grew after a reading of the Islamic religious texts, from which the Arya Samaj leader had steered cleared. In a letter to CR Das, Rai wrote, “There is one point more which has been troubling me very much of late and one which I want you to think carefully and that is the question of Hindu-Mohammedan unity. I have devoted most of my time during the last six months to study of Muslim history and Muslim law and I am inclined to think, it is neither possible nor practicable. Assuming and admitting the sincerity of the Mohammedan leaders in Non-cooperation movement, I think their religion provides an effective bar to anything of the kind… I do honestly and sincerely believe in the necessity of or desirability of Hindu-Muslim unity. I am also prepared to trust the Muslim leaders, but what about the injunctions of the Quran and Hadis? The leaders cannot override them.” (Quoted in BR Ambedkar’s Pakistan or Partition of India)
An assertive Islam is about to reorganise the world order as we know it. The Hamas, which one thought was Palestine-specific network, released a video recently as tribute to one of its leaders, Yasser Ghalban, who died in an internal battle between warring factions in Gaza. “We will rule the nations, by Allah’s will, the US will be conquered, Israel will be conquered, Rome and Britain will be conquered…” pronounces a reclining Ghalban in the video, promising to “crush the Jews and expel them from our country Palestine”. He further adds, “Just as the Jews ran from Gaza, the Americans will run from Iraq and Afghanistan… and the Indians will run from Kashmir.”
Seen in this light, Mr Murdoch’s assertion seems logical. Fundamentalist Muslims want to overrun all nations; turn them into Dar-ul-Islam. Veteran West Asia expert Bernard Lewis says of Islam: “It is a political identity and allegiance, transcending all others. Always in the ideal, and for a while even in reality, the world of Islam was one polity ruled by one sovereign, the caliph…” (Islam and the West).
The Muslim militia that took control of Mogadishu (Somalia) on June 6 last, have closed down the makeshift cinemas showing world cup soccer, forcibly cut young men’s hair if they were more than an inch long, and banned the New Year celebration on penalty of death. Sheik Hassan Dahir Aweys, the radical cleric named to lead Muslim militia, wants an Islamic state ruled by Shariah.
Islam, it was felt after the abolition of Caliphate in 1924, subsumed into nationalism and ideologies like Communism. However, most Muslim countries remained impervious to democracy. Are we heading towards ‘Islam versus rest’ scenario?
Tags: History, International Politics, Terrorism & Pakistan
On 06.12.06 The Acorn says:
Mahatma Gandhi had urged those being displaced by the Mulshi Peth dam being constructed by the Tata Power Company to negotiate the best deal they could get…Nehru was not an anti-thesis to Gandhi.[IIC Delhi] Today’s agitators — the cinematic, thetheatrical, the political and especially the ’saintly’ — have only ended up projecting the interests of ‘poor farmers’ as antithetical to the larger interests of the nation.
On 06.20.06 Something like life says:
. This (jockeying for UN post) is devoid of any intelligence. The benefits from successful outcome are hardly substantial. Even if assuming that Mr. Tharoor has the kajuns enough for hardball politics (doubtful if this comment bySandeep is to be believed), there is not much a Secy General can do to change the opinion in favour of one country. Recent experience shows that UN is not much effective against determined powers and international craft. However the investment by India is bound to be
On 06.30.06 varnam says:
demolished to construct a commercial building. Now in a welcome development, Pakistan is spending about $25 million for the restoration of the Katasraj temple. Pakistan has many famous Hindu temples like the
On 07.01.06 Niketan says:
Here is what TVR Shenoy has to say about Sashi Tharoor’s nomination. This almost mirrors what you said a few days back but srings some new facts.
Question : The point where he lists the past Secretary Generals is interesting. Mainly small nations - None of the First world nations or countries that aspire to be in their league - China, Russia etc have any candidates. I think the sensible thing would have been for India to withdraw in favor of Sri Lanka - in light of new developments in that country. Here is the article:
http://in.rediff.com/news/2006/jun/29flip.htm
On 07.01.06 Anonymous says:
Brilliant, timely and to the point. We need more such analysis that breaks through the self-imposed censorship of the so-called secular media in India.
On 07.02.06 Cynical Nerd’s says:
arsenals unless and until China (and the rest of the P-5) is effectively denuclearized. This in turn will never happen though India has always strived for global disarmament. India will therefore need to retain the nuclear option. The foreign policy pundits of the current UPA administration are obviously not in tune with Indian strategic priorities being busy kowtowing to Washington in this regard..
On 07.03.06 Alka says:
Sandeep, I read a series of articles on Islam on your website. I wonder, why moderate muslims won’t protest when someone malign their religion in the name of Jihad?
On 07.03.06 Sandeep says:
Alka,
You’re getting close to the answer! Try think of why and you’ll be surprised to learn a thing or two about “moderate muslims” and Jihad itself.
On 07.04.06 Atanu Dey says:
A few good links which illuminate this topic are http://www.faithfreedom.org, http://www.jihadwatch.org, and http://www.dhimmiwatch.org. See also http://thereligionofpeace.com/
On 07.07.06 interim thoughts... says:
a hundred odd years of British occupation. There are also a bunch of beyond-expiry-date politicians who are trying their best to turn the clock back. We also have leftists, corruption, communists and terrorists (verbal and others) who are trying their best in their own way to see to it that India remains retarded, ignorant and illiterate. Progress is about where you look. In India you can see the gutter as much as you can see telephone towers. If you chose to see
On 07.11.06 Desh says:
Sandeep:
Good article. Here is one review on a similar topic of “Tolerance” in Islam that I wrote on my blog: http://www.drishtikone.com/?q=node/1935
I am personally sick and tired of this tolerance discussion that goes in moderate Muslims!!
Would love your thoughts..
Cheers,
Desh
Drishtikone.com
On 07.18.06 Indian says:
I think India would be a great nation without a single Muslims.How to accomplish this?.
On 08.02.06 Desicritics.org: Media, Culture, Politics, Sports and More with a South Asian Focus says:
…state and non-state actors have already gotten the taste of censorship and bannings. Really? Unless he’s not tuned into news, Andhra Pradesh was one of the first states to ban the Code, and this, before the courts ruled against the banning. Whatever the claims justifying the ban, AP’s Chief Minister is a proselytizing Christian who went public with a statement that he’d challenge the court’s order. The non-state actors’ part is to a large extent, minimal. More on this later.
On 11.02.08 thalayclogaky says:
Test message
Sorry me noob…