Amil Imani has a nice piece on how useful idiots serve Islam’s cause by providing intellectual and moral justification for terrorism. He borrows Lenin’s coinage, and defines an Useful Idiot as
…as those who lived in liberal democracies and furthered the work of communism. This new generation of Useful Idiots also lives in liberal democracies but serves the cause of Islamofascism—another virulent form of totalitarian ideology.
and
Useful Idiots are naïve, foolish, ignorant of facts, unrealistically idealistic, dreamers, willfully in denial or deceptive. They hail from the ranks of the chronically unhappy, the anarchists, the aspiring revolutionaries, the neurotics who are at war with life, the disaffected alienated from government, corporations, and just about any and all institutions of society. The Useful Idiot can be a billionaire, a movie star, an academe of renown, a politician, or from any other segment of the population.
Arguably, the most dangerous Useful Idiot is the “Politically Correct.” He is the master practitioner of euphemism, hedging, doubletalk, and outright deception.
The Useful Idiot derives satisfaction from being anti-establishment. He finds perverse gratification in aiding the forces that aim to dismantle an existing order, whatever it may be: an order he neither approves of nor he feels he belongs to.
The Useful Idiot is conflicted and dishonest. He fails to look inside himself and discover the causes of his own problems and unhappiness while he readily enlists himself in causes that validate his distorted perception.
Imani says nothing new but only says it differently: beautifully differently. We have plenty of such useful idiots at home; in fact, we even have its variation: the Resident Idiot; this will probably need changing to Useful Resident Idiot.
Needless to say, these useful idiots are generally Communists.
Anyway, read it in full.
Tags: History, Indian Politics, Pseudo Secularism Hall of Shame, Terrorism & Pakistan, War on Communism
test
Well that Imani article was a collection of distorted facts about Islam and was iconoclastic. It doesn’t makes sense and reflects his own prejudices against Islam. By the way how do you justify Lenin’s assault? He along with Stalin were the most brutal buchers of last century.
Well that Imani article was a collection of distorted facts about Islam and was iconoclastic. It doesn’t makes sense and reflects his own prejudices against Islam. By the way how do you justify Lenin’s assault? He along with Stalin were the most brutal butchers of last century.
That Imani article is a collection of distorted Islamic facts. He is being iconoclastic and to prove his point he distorts history or perhaps interprets according to his wishes. How do you justify your standing if you have based the article on philosophies of Lenin, one of the most brutal buchers of last century.
I do agree with your views on Useful Resident Idiot.
well frist we have to sayu ismal is good but it is good due to the flower n guru what every that called him.as we know that all muslim r not educated so they make fool confortable. other than Imani says nothing new but only says it differently: beautifully differently. We have plenty of such useful idiots at home; in fact, we even have its variation: the Resident Idiot; this will probably need changing to Useful Resident Idiot.
Needless to say, these useful idiots are generally Communists
they get money 4
Challenge to All Muslims
Islam can justifiably be condemned as a barbaric ideology that has energized and continues to energize crimes against humanity. Islam belongs to a raft of doctrines such as Nazism, Fascism and Totalitarianisms of various stripes that promotes hate and violence against others. Despicable doctrines of hate and violence remain confined to their place under the “shameful” classification in libraries until people adopt them as their program of life. Hence, it is people who are guilty of bringing to life the dogmas of savagery.
In the same way that ignorance of the law does not constitute a valid defense, not bothering to find out about the true nature of Islamic precepts and practices and blindly doing Islam’s biddings constitutes inexcusable wrongdoing. Muslims, therefore, are indictable for subscribing to the Quran and committing themselves to carrying out its ruthless instructions at great harm to the non-subscribers.
A vast cadre of Islamic apologists, generally from the ranks of the well-pampered parasitic clergy, labor greatly at defending Islam and keeping the masses in servitude. In practice, these sheepdogs of Islam earn their very livelihood by devouring the sheep they herd
http://www.amilimani.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=29&Itemid=2