For a straightforward reason: they have already compromised India’s sovereignty.
The gentle Dr. Singh has been gently stripping off the mask of making a difference. With this, he has come out in the open.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh courted controversy in his address at the National Development Council on Saturday by saying that Muslims should have the first claim on the country’s resources. [..] “We will have to devise innovative plans to ensure that minorities, particularly the Muslim minority, are empowered to share equitably in the fruits of development. They must have the first claim on resources,” Singh said.
Coming from Dr. Clean’s mouth, this statement is designed to cast the dubious Sachar Committee Report in a respectable forge. The furious debate over the Sachar Report misses a fundamental question: was there a real need for collecting community-based statistics in the first place? Assuming there was, it should have logically been done in the initial years after India became independent. It should’ve then been periodically reviewed to see if it worked. Countless Sachar reports have been tabled, recommendations accepted, sops granted, newer schemes introduced… nothing has worked. For obvious reasons. But nothing beats the sheer devilry of Dr.Singh’s statement that a particular community should have the “first claim over resources.” In Hindi cinema parlance, he’s making the country’s resources the baap ki jaagir of a particular community. Sachar’s findings, whatever its intentions are, won’t help if the same Dr. Singh’s government creates a parallel infastructure that places Madrassas above scrutiny.
While Pakistan is made to windup its terror infrastructure, which is closely linked to a mushroom growth of madrassas, Maharashtra’s Deputy Chief Minister R. R. Patil has designed a novel methodology of regularising several thousand madrassas, where students are being taught among other things to kill ‘the qafir’ (non-believer).
There is lot of anger in India against madrassas run by the fundamentalist Islamic organisations, which, according to intelligence agencies, form the hot-bed of ’sleeper cells’ of jihadi terrorist outfits, with bases in Pakistan and Bangladesh… However, the association of clerics in Maharashtra has already slammed the door on government intervention. They say the financial help is fine, but no interference.
Across the border, surprising tidings beckon our attention.
In an attempt to help students get the cutting edge in their higher education and career, Pakistan government has decided to switch to English from Urdu as the medium of instruction and make the language compulsory right from the primary level.
English would be compulsory from class I countrywide from the beginning of next academic year commencing Sept 1, 2007, Federal Minister for Education General (retired) Javed Ashraf Qazi said.
In a guise to “uplift” the backward Muslims, Dr.Singh announces a scheme that’s certain to further Islamize India, while a “pure” Islamic country seems to be headed in sensible direction. The contrast can’t be more painful.
As a precusor to the Sachar bomb, Dr. Singh’s unruly colleague, Arjun “Slaughter” Singh has already implemented the same thing in a different sphere, although the Singh-duo’s actions lead to the same consequences.
Neither is Dr. Clean’s statement grounded in commonsense, repeated ad nauseam on this blog and elsewhere: not all “upper caste” people are millionaires, and not all Muslims/OBCs/SCs/STs live in penury. The sole criterion should be economic backwardness, not tabulation of caste/class/community data that will lead nowhere. But the UPA has tied itself into inextricable knots over the reservations issue, which will continue to lead to questions like this:
We already have a social justice policy for all backward classes dont we ? It is called the OBC quota for all social and educationally backward Indians. In many states, the entire muslim population is covered under OBC. So, at best the Sachar report proves that (1) the OBC policy is not sufficient for Muslims or (2) the selection of castes for OBCs itself is wrong. In other words, the arbitrariness of the OBC grouping has resulted in Muslims getting the short end of the stick.
The report is actually pretty well written and I dont think anyone can really accept the OBC grouping and not accept the fact the Muslims are shortchanged. You cant have it both ways.
Well… anyone who can muster enough numbers can prove that his group is shortchanged one way or the other, rest assured the UPA will make room to foster another round of loot reservations. The bleeding heart crowd will only jump in gleefully to marshall figures, tables, and other stats to prove that the latest entrant terrible is indeed backward.
And further splinter an already-fragmented nation.
On that note, Pranab Mukherjee who roared courageously a few weeks ago seems to have forgotten what China still hasn’t.
The controversy over China’s claim over Arunachal Pradesh seems far from over.
Amid India’s strong rejection of Chinese claim of sovereignty over Arunachal Pradesh, Beijing had sought to downplay the issue, saying it was the “strategic goal” of the two countries to find an early, fair and rational solution to the vexed boundary issue.
But that was then. The story has progressed today with Beijing’s envoy to India Sun Yaxi claiming that “some area” of the northeastern state was being negotiated between the two countries.
Interestingly, Pranab’s own ally, the Left has maintained an outwardly saint-like silence over this episode, while its mouthpiece has spoken favourably about giving away Arunachal Pradesh to China. The Left’s extended family has proved to be a perpetual pinprick to the UPA, forcing it to make the right noises when public outcry becomes intolerable at times.
But the same worthies have taken exception to the Nuclear deal with the US.
The CPI-M on Monday said the US legislation on the Indo-US nuclear deal was “not acceptable” as it would seriously undermine India’s independent foreign policy.
This reason, coming from the Commies’ mouth sounds hilarious, especially when seen in the light of its “independent” policy on China. The Left has never been serious about India’s territorial integrity, right from Nehru’s days when they argued for India-as-USSR-satellite to supporting the Chinese invasion to Jyoti Basu’s threat of secession to now. The Nucleardeal is unfavourable to India for various other reasons than the Left’s anti-US rhetoric, which is driven solely by ideology. Commonsense says that it is dangerous to expose your nation’s nuclear activities to a country, whose policy is driven primarily by self-interest.
The UPA has proved thoroughly inept on all these, and other counts. The UPA clowns couldn’t rectify a tiny, powerless Nepal; it sleeps on even as Sri Lanka is on the brink of a civil war, not to mention some hush-hush US-sponsored “exercises”; it cannot ensure the safety of its own citizens in the now-countless terror attacks on its own soil…
India’s sovereignty stands threatened like never before.
Is there any sense in letting these guys complete their term?
Cross-posted on INI Signal.
Tags: Commentary, Election 2004, Indian Politics, International Politics, Terrorism & Pakistan, War on Communism, Weblogs
On 12.11.06 anangbhai says:
Agree with you on the commies. FUCK communism.
The government should stay away from matters religious, whether hindu or muslim. That includes not giving any institution financial aid of any kind.
Strict-er education standards should be applied to students graduating from the madrassas, some kind of accreditation system, to ensure that they are recieving proper education and not just a religious one.
If you’re favoring one group, any group above the others then you’re favoring discrimination. No one is entitled to anything, no one “deserves” the resources, you have to work for it, just like everything else.
On 12.12.06 Ravindra says:
Ultimately, it will have to be the Principal Opposition Party (BJP) which will have to politically tackle these issues. Merely posting indignant views on the blogosphere or even taking to the streets will not have the desired impact, if the political opposition does not take up the issue seriously. The anti-reservation protests in April-May 06 are a case in point.
Unfortunately, the pinko media tries to dub every single whimper of protest by the BJP as being “politcally motivated”. Arre bhai, it is a political party, so it is bound to be politically motivated, whats wrong with that? But whether it is the protest on the PM’s Muslims remark or on the Indo-China relations, the media was constantly drubbing the BJP rather than focussing on what point it was trying to make. For instance, yesterday, both the CNN-IBN and the NDTV-India devoted half hour programs on this issue. Infact the NDTV had a poll which went like:
Is the BJP’s opposition to the PM’s remark
a) a political stunt
b) an attempt to bring together Hindus and Muslims
c) a waste of the country’s resources and easy politics
How much more contrived can these polls get?
On 12.12.06 Sandeep says:
Ravindra,
The question is not so much whether what the BJP or any other party is willing to do but “who will bell the cat?”
On 12.13.06 Thanks Manmohanji « Coffee Cup Stories says:
[...] Oh , sorry here it is http://www.sandeepweb.com/2006/12/11/why-the-upa-government-should-be-dismissed/ [...]
On 12.23.07 10 Most Loathsome People in India: 2007 » Seriously Sandeep says:
[...] Loathsome for a solitary reason: spinelessness. Everything else flows from there. Decency is not equal to cowardice. This accidental Prime Minister persists in pusillanimity despite just calls for resignation. [...]
On 03.14.08 Seriously Sandeep – ManmohanZeb says:
[...] More on how that first-claim-on-resources originated. SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: “ManmohanZeb”, url: “http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/03/14/manmohanzeb/” }); [...]