Comments on: Violence in Bangalore http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/ Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:59:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Sameer http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/comment-page-1/#comment-167581 Sameer Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:52:22 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/#comment-167581 Sandeep, Great job and nice to read the views of real people of Bangalore than the bastardised 'Secular' 'Mainstream' media. Keep it up!! -Sameer Sandeep,

Great job and nice to read the views of real people of Bangalore than the bastardised ‘Secular’ ‘Mainstream’ media.

Keep it up!!
-Sameer

]]> By: varnam http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/comment-page-1/#comment-167474 varnam Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:43:57 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/#comment-167474 <strong>The 1921 Model...</strong> It was on  March 3rd, 1924 that Kemal Ataturk abolished the Caliphate and transferred the power to to the Turkish Grand National Assembly. But sometime in 1921, rumors spread in India that the Caliphate was abolished  and violence erupted in.... The 1921 Model…

It was on  March 3rd, 1924 that Kemal Ataturk abolished the Caliphate and transferred the power to to the Turkish Grand National Assembly. But sometime in 1921, rumors spread in India that the Caliphate was abolished  and violence erupted in….

]]> By: Pioneer on Bangalore Violence : seriously sandeep http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/comment-page-1/#comment-167389 Pioneer on Bangalore Violence : seriously sandeep Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:02:19 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/#comment-167389 [...] Violence in Bangalore [...] [...] Violence in Bangalore [...]

]]> By: The Spin Begins : seriously sandeep http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/comment-page-1/#comment-167373 The Spin Begins : seriously sandeep Wed, 24 Jan 2007 05:19:21 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/#comment-167373 [...] Violence in Bangalore [...] [...] Violence in Bangalore [...]

]]> By: Sandeep http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/comment-page-1/#comment-167371 Sandeep Wed, 24 Jan 2007 04:49:54 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/#comment-167371 Harish, Great follow up, thanks :) Harish,

Great follow up, thanks :)

]]> By: Harish Duggirala http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/comment-page-1/#comment-167338 Harish Duggirala Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:51:46 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/#comment-167338 On a related note here is a clash that happened in Indore on Jan 22, 2007: "The trouble erupted when a group belonging to the minority community brandished swords in front of an office bearer of a saffron outfit, Superintendent of Police Anshuman Singh Yadav said. http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1905914,0009.htm " All this confirms to the general tradition of riots in India (i.e Muslims start most of the riots despite being a minority). On a related note here is a clash that happened in Indore on Jan 22, 2007:

“The trouble erupted when a group belonging to the minority community brandished swords in front of an office bearer of a saffron outfit, Superintendent of Police Anshuman Singh Yadav said.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1905914,0009.htm ”

All this confirms to the general tradition of riots in India (i.e Muslims start most of the riots despite being a minority).

]]> By: Harish Duggirala http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/comment-page-1/#comment-167337 Harish Duggirala Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:47:30 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/#comment-167337 INJURED LIST Bangaloe, dhns: The thirty-one persons injured in Sunday’s violence in the city are: Jabbar (18), Imran (20)and 29 others... The thirty-one persons injured in Sunday’s violence in the city are: Jabbar (18), Imran (20), Rizwan (20), Ateek (40), Thimmaiah(42), Umesh (30), Shameem (37), Idayat (24), Aiyappa (21), Malle Gowda (30), Nagarajappa (49), Narayana Swamy (40), Nadeem (21), Rafi (45), Ramachandre Gowda (38), Premanath (25), Jaleel (65), Abida (45), Irfan (20), Nagarajan (43), Renuka Prasad (27), Firoz (22), Nagesh Rao (29), Prakash (41), Ashwathaiah (47), Siddesh (38), Narayana Swamy (44), Venkatesh Naik (29), Chandrappa (37), Muniraju (28) and Kumar (19). http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/jan222007/city220592007122.asp 19 of the 31 appear to be Hindus going by their names so the violence is not one sided and there is no "innocent as a lamb" minority in Bangalore as projected by the media. INJURED LIST

Bangaloe, dhns:

The thirty-one persons injured in Sunday’s violence in the city are: Jabbar (18), Imran (20)and 29 others…

The thirty-one persons injured in Sunday’s violence in the city are:

Jabbar (18), Imran (20), Rizwan (20), Ateek (40), Thimmaiah(42), Umesh (30), Shameem (37), Idayat (24), Aiyappa (21), Malle Gowda (30), Nagarajappa (49), Narayana Swamy (40), Nadeem (21), Rafi (45), Ramachandre Gowda (38), Premanath (25), Jaleel (65), Abida (45), Irfan (20), Nagarajan (43), Renuka Prasad (27), Firoz (22), Nagesh Rao (29), Prakash (41), Ashwathaiah (47), Siddesh (38), Narayana Swamy (44), Venkatesh Naik (29), Chandrappa (37), Muniraju (28) and Kumar (19).

http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/jan222007/city220592007122.asp

19 of the 31 appear to be Hindus going by their names so the violence is not one sided and there is no “innocent as a lamb” minority in Bangalore as projected by the media.

]]> By: Harish Duggirala http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/comment-page-1/#comment-167336 Harish Duggirala Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:45:11 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/#comment-167336 The violence did not start during the Hindu procession, it started a day before on Jan 20 when the protester's against US removed posters concerning the Hindu gathering, here is the confirmation: "The trouble broke out when a banner relating to "Virat Hindu Samajotsav" was removed by a group of people on way to attend the rally, which led to tension and stone-pelting, police said. http://www.timesnow.tv/Sections/News/Bangalore_on_alert_after_violence/articleshow/1327105.cms " I am guessing that the Hindu gathering was to be held on Jan 21, on the first day Muslims attacked Hindus and destroyed several shops and vehicle's, so on Jan 21 Hindus replied the same way by torching a few Muslim shops but the spark was lit by the secular party on Jan 20. The violence did not start during the Hindu procession, it started a day before on Jan 20 when the protester’s against US removed posters concerning the Hindu gathering, here is the confirmation:

“The trouble broke out when a banner relating to “Virat Hindu Samajotsav” was removed by a group of people on way to attend the rally, which led to tension and stone-pelting, police said.

http://www.timesnow.tv/Sections/News/Bangalore_on_alert_after_violence/articleshow/1327105.cms ”

I am guessing that the Hindu gathering was to be held on Jan 21, on the first day Muslims attacked Hindus and destroyed several shops and vehicle’s, so on Jan 21 Hindus replied the same way by torching a few Muslim shops but the spark was lit by the secular party on Jan 20.

]]> By: jk http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/comment-page-1/#comment-167334 jk Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:53:51 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/#comment-167334 Sandeep, I was just kidding. Sandeep, I was just kidding.

]]> By: RR http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/comment-page-1/#comment-167328 RR Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:38:21 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/01/22/violence-in-bangalore/#comment-167328 >>Did these guys come to know only yesterday that Saddam was hanged? News travels slow to Bangalore. Any excuse will do for those who wanted to instigate riots. Sunday's Hindu rally was advertised long, long ago. Banners were put up announcing it as far back as the beginning of the new year. The Saddam rally was conjured up just a few days ago, strategically timed to occur just a couple days before the Hindu rally. During this Saddam rally, a dispute was deliberately provoked by pulling down banners of the Hindu rally. There was trouble on Friday itself; the reporting of which seems to have been deliberately suppressed in the media. >>Did these guys come to know only yesterday that Saddam was hanged? News travels slow to Bangalore.

Any excuse will do for those who wanted to instigate riots.

Sunday’s Hindu rally was advertised long, long ago. Banners were put up announcing it as far back as the beginning of the new year. The Saddam rally was conjured up just a few days ago, strategically timed to occur just a couple days before the Hindu rally. During this Saddam rally, a dispute was deliberately provoked by pulling down banners of the Hindu rally. There was trouble on Friday itself; the reporting of which seems to have been deliberately suppressed in the media.

]]>