The title of this post I think, is pretty cool. One can write a novel titled thus. Imagine, what a bestseller it’d make: Annie Sobs Again…
What I’m talking about instead is about our bleeding heart Annie whom this blog had covered earlier. Her heart bleeds for street children. Again.
One of the concern that events at Nithari have brought back into focus - though we really do try hard to keep pushing it back into the place its burrowed out of; out of sight and mind and conversation - is child abuse.
And again.
About 10 percent, i.e., about 36,500 children are lucky enough to find their way into various facilities like juvenile institutions, homes, shelters, or other state-supported infrastructure. There is zero guarantee that they will be safe and happy here. But their chances of suvival, of not being isolated, and not being physically, sexually or economically abused are higher, as compared to their chances on the streets. Those who don’t live in families or in state-run facilities end up in private institutions where, thanks to a poor monitoring mechanism, they sometimes find themselves abused. Something like this happened at the Swami Balnath Ashram in Ghaziabad.[...] Some of them were severely malnourished but it was hard to say whether that is neglect or whether that is because they have recently arrived and they came from poor homes. Some girls had injuries and scars, which they refused to explain. A few seemed very sick and in urgent need of medical attention. Balnath, the saffron-clad swami, claimed that one girl had been in and out of hospital. That she’d needed a saline drip. To me, she looked very much like she still needed to be in hospital and still needed a saline drip. Probably a lot more.
I sincerely share her concern for these poor abused, victimized kids and the brutes should be severely punished. But as is her wont, Annie simply shows us only part of the story.
For every Balnath Ashram, you have scores of Churches where this kind of thing occurs so often that it is commonplace now. To an extent that it is not even newsworthy.
Before I leave, Annie rather predictably marshalls the usual suspects to shore up her case.
Inu Annie Stephen, a strategy alliance coordinator for the Childline India Foundation, knows that the resource crunch is frustrating and limiting, especially when it comes to special services attuned to needs.
LOL. Childline India Foundation is one of those innumerable “NGOs” which are simply garbs for Christian evangelism. It is part of the Child Rights Information Network, whose stated motto and mission is to establish
….Christ’s Kingdom among all people and in all areas of life; to share the life of Christ through evangelism, healing ministries, education and social services; to develop bonding links and partnership with women of other Christian Churches, ecumenical bodies, and the United Nations in promoting peace and justice.
And more predictably, Inu Annie Stephen quotes that other outfit established by the arch-evangelist of all time, “Mother” Theresa, as saying:
We have emergency services and organisations like the Missionaries of Charity, but even NGOs get fed up of our requests.
Annie, we know you’re well-intentioned but please try not to omit uncomfortable facts the next time you write on “social issues.” Paedophiles come in various disguises, and not all of them wear saffron robes. Some adorn themselves with cassocks, aprons, tunicles, and stoles.
Tags: Media Watch, Society & Culture, War on Communism, Weblogs
On 01.30.07 Ravindra says:
I’m surprised we dont yet have headlines screaming “Hindu paedophile cannibals devour 18 children in Nithari”!
Or better still!
“Upper caste Hindus kidnap, abuse and cannibalise 18 lower caste children in Nithari”!
On 01.30.07 Sandeep says:
Ravindra,
Rotfl
On 01.30.07 indian says:
> Paedophiles come in various disguises, and not all of them
> wear saffron robes. Some adorn themselves with cassocks,
> aprons, tunicles, and stoles.
wow. seriously sandeep, this is profound. you figured it out onn your own?
im looking, but dont see anywhere in anie’s article that she says padeophiles only wear saffron.
but why bother with that??
On 01.30.07 Sandeep says:
Indian,
>>wow. seriously sandeep, this is profound. you figured it out onn your own?
Bad try. Maybe you should read Mcflecknoe and then attempt sarcasm.
>>im looking, but dont see anywhere in anie’s article that she says padeophiles only wear saffron.
No? Well, going by your own admission, I’m amazing at figuring out things on my own. Here is the “saffron” clarification you seek from this link, which incidentally, I’ve mentioned in the post: http://knownturf.blogspot.com/2007/01/needs-abuses-options.html
Balnath, the saffron-clad swami, claimed that one girl had been in and out of hospital.
And my dear Indian, my grouse with annie is not that she says “paedophiles only wear saffron”–nor have I said it–but with her selective condemnation. I said that much in my post.
It’s evident from your comment that you didn’t get it.
You’re right, but why bother with that?
On 01.31.07 Harish Duggirala says:
“Upper caste Hindus kidnap, abuse and cannibalise 18 lower caste children in Nithari”!
Wait for some time, you will see the spin, here is something:
“The All India Christian Council believes such an attitude could only be explained by the fact that the victims came from poor or dalit families, often from other states or belonging to religious minorities. The council sent a team to visit the afflicted families. The parents of the children who went missing say the children of rich or high caste families living in the surroundings had not lost their children.
John Dayal, secretary-general of the All India Christian Council, said the magistrate of Chouhan district and the police stopped the council’s fact-finding team because they thought that the Christian community was trying to get its hands on the relatives of the victims by helping them. Dayal replied by saying that the magistrate had not understood the reason behind the visit of the Christian delegation to the families of the victims, which was to take the love and care that Jesus taught to offer to those in need.
http://www.asianews.it/index.php?l=en&art=8163&size=A ”
Did they ask for their love and care?
On 01.31.07 Sandeep says:
>>Did they ask for their love and care?
LOL. Why does this oddly remind me of CMM, ISO process freaks who advocate “process” as the panacea for all problems. Much like the evangelists offer Jesus.
On 02.01.07 RR says:
Is saffron to Annie what the red rag is to the bull?
While on the subject, she’s definitely doling out a lotta bull though.