Ayodhya Redux?

09.13.07 | 5 Comments | Filed Under Commentary, Indian Politics, Media Watch, War on Communism

Typical of the ineptitude, double-standards, and a shameless vulgarity that characterizes it, the UPA government has done a volte face within 24 hours. As this superb piece elucidates, the UPA had no business to speculate on the historicity of Rama in an affidavit purported to defend its position on constructing the Sethu canal.

Having said this, the Sonia Maino-led administration’s efforts to challenge the Ramayana and the historicity of Rama to counter the VHP-led agitation needs to be condemned. The Archeological Survey of India (ASI), under instruction from the political leadership in New Delhi, filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court yesterday claiming that there was no historical evidence that Rama or other individuals in the Ramayana ever existed. The debate is no longer about the Sethusamudram but is now about the civilizational contours of India.

No secular Government has the prerogative to pontificate on religion unless the public good is adversely impacted. Rama and the Ramayana transcend history. They belong to the realm of religion and assume an importance independent of historical empiricism. While the ASI had the undeniable right to challenge the VHP’s position on the Sethusamudram canal, it had no authority to question the historicity of Rama.

Something needs to be said urgently about the stubbornness of the UPA to insist on being foolish–it’s almost timeless. The spurious brand of secularism that the Congress-Left combine imposed on the country for more than four decades ultimately culminated in Ayodhya, 1992. A political leadership that says it owes its election to secularism and the aam aadmi has used its machinery to interfere in a purely religious domain.

We might reasonably say that we are more or less witnessing the same phenomenon as the events leading up to Ayodhya 1992. An unholy nexus of the establishment, academia and media teaming up together to deny, distort and deceive a nation of its own priceless, timeless heritage. There’s a crucial difference though. During the Ayodhya episode, the government merely acted as a facilitator, and Rajiv Gandhi ultimately gave in due to the pressure mounted on him by Hindus. During the evidence-gathering phase, the government was–very broadly speaking–a scared spectator watching which way the scale turned. This time however, with lunatics like Karunanidhi in the UPA, the government has become the official spokesperson to pontificate on religious matters.

In the midst of a political controversy over the Sethusamudram project, the Centre on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that there was no historical evidence to establish the existence of Lord Rama or the other characters in Ramayana.

As Jaffna rightly says,

I level a broader critique of the Congress administration. It would not have dared question the historicity of the Bible or Quran. But it sure feels empowered to dismiss Hindu literature through a Supreme Court affidavit. It would have been one thing to challenge the VHP’s position on the Sethusamudram, quite another to conveniently extend the attack on the Ramayana itself.

Perhaps, the UPA has quickly realized the stupidity of opening its mouth too quickly. Later in the day, it has "assured" the people that Rama did indeed exist!

The Centre will withdraw “offending remarks” from an affidavit which said there is no scientific or historical evidence to prove the existence of Lord Ram…. “Lord Ram is an integral part of Hindu faith” and his existence can never be doubted, said Union Law Minister H R Bharadwaj. He announced the Government would on Friday file a supplementary affidavit on the Sethusamudram canal project before the Supreme Court and the Archaeological Survey of India’s affidavit will be cleansed of offending remarks.

But the damage has been done. The perception of Hinduism and Hindu philosophy, Gods, symbols, and icons today is not the same as it was in 1992. Considering this issue in purely partisan political terms, the relative significance of Ayodhya and the Ram Sethu differ in their ability to rouse passions among Hindus. I seriously don’t know how many people had even heard about a Ram Sethu before the project to destroy it was announced. The UPA, by questioning Rama’s existence has thrown the boulder on its own foot.

PS: A few months ago, India Reacts had published a six-part series on the Sethusamudram project. It is a must-read. Start here.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

timeline

5 Comments

Leave your comment

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. Subscribe to these comments.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

:

: