Comments on: Brief Survey of Rama in Tamil Tradition http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/ Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:27:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: nitin http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/comment-page-1/#comment-196008 nitin Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:41:27 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/#comment-196008 i m nitin i m nitin

]]> By: The Examined Life » Blog Archive » The Examined Week -19/10 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/comment-page-1/#comment-194867 The Examined Life » Blog Archive » The Examined Week -19/10 Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:36:04 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/#comment-194867 [...] Sandeep surveys  Rama in Tamil tradition. [...] [...] Sandeep surveys  Rama in Tamil tradition. [...]

]]> By: kaangeya http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/comment-page-1/#comment-194778 kaangeya Thu, 18 Oct 2007 23:40:46 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/#comment-194778 Why should one seek any historical basis for Rama at all? Why reduce it to a pale version of the dogma based cults where one must accept the historicity of its prime characters or else all fails. Why should one seek any historical basis for Rama at all? Why reduce it to a pale version of the dogma based cults where one must accept the historicity of its prime characters or else all fails.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/comment-page-1/#comment-194446 Anonymous Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:28:53 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/#comment-194446 How the pin head ruin India's national interest. http://www.indianexpress.com/story/229014.html This is by someone known "not" to support the "dreaded" Parivar. How the pin head ruin India’s national interest.

http://www.indianexpress.com/story/229014.html

This is by someone known “not” to support the “dreaded” Parivar.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/comment-page-1/#comment-194417 Anonymous Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:06:06 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/#comment-194417 Another reason why i don't hate Bush http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/10/17/dalai.lama/index.html He just "does it" Another reason why i don’t hate Bush

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/10/17/dalai.lama/index.html

He just “does it”

]]> By: Sriram http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/comment-page-1/#comment-194372 Sriram Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:19:04 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/#comment-194372 Sandeep, I wonder if anyone contested the fact that Rama was represented in Tamil literature. The arguments of Balaji in Offstumped's post conceded to this fact - that Rama had always been a literary figure in Tamil. The problem now is Rama's historicity. ASI has never undertaken any project to verify his historicity. That in my opinion is the main issue and your post hardly bolsters that case. Sandeep, I wonder if anyone contested the fact that Rama was represented in Tamil literature. The arguments of Balaji in Offstumped’s post conceded to this fact – that Rama had always been a literary figure in Tamil. The problem now is Rama’s historicity. ASI has never undertaken any project to verify his historicity. That in my opinion is the main issue and your post hardly bolsters that case.

]]> By: Aravind http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/comment-page-1/#comment-194367 Aravind Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:39:36 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/#comment-194367 Good work sandeep...Just one typo though...It is 'Nalayira DivyaPrambhandham' and not 'Natayira' Good work sandeep…Just one typo though…It is ‘Nalayira DivyaPrambhandham’ and not ‘Natayira’

]]> By: Pandava http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/comment-page-1/#comment-194308 Pandava Wed, 17 Oct 2007 05:57:18 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/#comment-194308 Ten times more sensible article that anything our sukoolar brigade ever managed to piece together. Shri Rama is not anymore a northerner in the Indian consciousness than Surya is an Easterner. These pathetic attempts to sow discord among Hindus by secularists will not work. Hindus realize that Secularists are merely rehashing the western colonial agenda. India is diverse despite Islam, Christianity, and Secularism, all three of which try to destroy cultural diversity. Ten times more sensible article that anything our sukoolar brigade ever managed to piece together. Shri Rama is not anymore a northerner in the Indian consciousness than Surya is an Easterner.

These pathetic attempts to sow discord among Hindus by secularists will not work. Hindus realize that Secularists are merely rehashing the western colonial agenda. India is diverse despite Islam, Christianity, and Secularism, all three of which try to destroy cultural diversity.

]]> By: Sandeep http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/comment-page-1/#comment-194303 Sandeep Wed, 17 Oct 2007 05:27:37 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/#comment-194303 Hi Sharada, I can write in Kannada but I don't write in Kannada online. You can send me an email at sanwriterATgmailDOTCOM. Hi Sharada,

I can write in Kannada but I don’t write in Kannada online. You can send me an email at sanwriterATgmailDOTCOM.

]]> By: sharada http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/comment-page-1/#comment-194296 sharada Wed, 17 Oct 2007 05:00:29 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2007/10/17/brief-survey-of-rama-in-tamil-tradition/#comment-194296 Good work . I really admire the content of ur well researched articles. Do u write in kannada too?? By the way how I we get in touch with u?? Good work .
I really admire the content of ur well researched articles.
Do u write in kannada too?? By the way how I we get in touch with u??

]]>