<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dharma 101: A Critique</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abhi</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247727</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247727</guid>
		<description>Aren't these two statements contradictory?

"Dharma is about righteousness of actions. It is about righteousness which is universal and eternal i.e. it is invariant of time (when the action took place), place (where the action took place) and context (why the action took place)."

"However, the definition of Dharma unambiguously states that Dharma is fluid, and should also take into account time and place, which are ever-changing."

Or, does one refer to samanya dharma and the other refers to vishesha dharma?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t these two statements contradictory?</p>
<p>&#8220;Dharma is about righteousness of actions. It is about righteousness which is universal and eternal i.e. it is invariant of time (when the action took place), place (where the action took place) and context (why the action took place).&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;However, the definition of Dharma unambiguously states that Dharma is fluid, and should also take into account time and place, which are ever-changing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or, does one refer to samanya dharma and the other refers to vishesha dharma?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepak</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247689</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247689</guid>
		<description>That made a very good read. Sure was enlightening and provide great insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That made a very good read. Sure was enlightening and provide great insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaafir</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247675</link>
		<dc:creator>kaafir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247675</guid>
		<description>Comment format request - it'll be nice if the name of the person commenting is at the top of the comment box rather than at the bottom. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment format request - it&#8217;ll be nice if the name of the person commenting is at the top of the comment box rather than at the bottom. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247592</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247592</guid>
		<description>Dhruv,

Yes, it does. 

I said "wheel as a symbolism of Dharma," there's a big difference. And you're right, it veers more towards Buddhism but the seed/root lies in Sanatana Dharma as I've explained in my post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dhruv,</p>
<p>Yes, it does. </p>
<p>I said &#8220;wheel as a symbolism of Dharma,&#8221; there&#8217;s a big difference. And you&#8217;re right, it veers more towards Buddhism but the seed/root lies in Sanatana Dharma as I&#8217;ve explained in my post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balaji</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247579</link>
		<dc:creator>Balaji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247579</guid>
		<description>Sandeep,

Good post. I agree with you that reducing Dharma as the 'how' is a bit superfluous. Dharma definitely is based on the time and community practices. Laws of Manu, Ramayana, Mahabharatha all chronicle and expound on Dharma as expounded at the time of writing and cannot be treated as guidelines for eternity.

And this story is about &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4461196.stm" rel="nofollow"&gt;Polyandry&lt;/a&gt; practiced to this day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandeep,</p>
<p>Good post. I agree with you that reducing Dharma as the &#8216;how&#8217; is a bit superfluous. Dharma definitely is based on the time and community practices. Laws of Manu, Ramayana, Mahabharatha all chronicle and expound on Dharma as expounded at the time of writing and cannot be treated as guidelines for eternity.</p>
<p>And this story is about <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4461196.stm" rel="nofollow">Polyandry</a> practiced to this day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Dharma 201 - Part 2 &#124; Offstumped</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247559</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Dharma 201 - Part 2 &#124; Offstumped</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247559</guid>
		<description>[...] Continuing the 201, the first part can be found here. This part will focus on reader comments from 101. Also read Sandeep&#8217;s critique of 101. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Continuing the 201, the first part can be found here. This part will focus on reader comments from 101. Also read Sandeep&#8217;s critique of 101. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Dharma 201 - Part 1 &#124; Offstumped</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247540</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Dharma 201 - Part 1 &#124; Offstumped</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247540</guid>
		<description>[...] For those who checked in recently, it all started here with this 101 and the subsequent comments. Since the 101, Sandeep has published this critique. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For those who checked in recently, it all started here with this 101 and the subsequent comments. Since the 101, Sandeep has published this critique. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dhruv</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247537</link>
		<dc:creator>Dhruv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247537</guid>
		<description>Hi Sandeep,

I am now curious: does the word Rtu meaning season originate from Rta?

Also the whole thing about Dharma being a wheel, I have not come across this metaphor before. Sounded a little Buddhist in its style. Is it so? Could you let me know what particular Shaastra uses this analogy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sandeep,</p>
<p>I am now curious: does the word Rtu meaning season originate from Rta?</p>
<p>Also the whole thing about Dharma being a wheel, I have not come across this metaphor before. Sounded a little Buddhist in its style. Is it so? Could you let me know what particular Shaastra uses this analogy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yossarin</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247521</link>
		<dc:creator>Yossarin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247521</guid>
		<description>Thanks will respond soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks will respond soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep</title>
		<link>http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247507</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandeepweb.com/2008/07/07/dharma-101-a-critique/#comment-247507</guid>
		<description>Kedar,

I have not read either book. 

I have written about Rta and Dharma in this post itself, as also earlier. Please read the 1st part of my contextual morality series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kedar,</p>
<p>I have not read either book. </p>
<p>I have written about Rta and Dharma in this post itself, as also earlier. Please read the 1st part of my contextual morality series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
