Omigod the Hatred!
Friday, 15. August 2008 - 6:31 AM
Here is Outlook’s Seema Sirohi writhing in an orgasm pumped by hatred against American Hindus. I obviously didn’t read through the whole article; read it if you must. The choicest bits, for your reading pleasure.
Their essential thesis goes thus—Bharat is besieged from within and without, it is maligned and abused, and it must rise to defend itself. As soldiers stationed abroad, they wage the daily battle via the internet to defend all things Hindu, preposterous or perfunctory, ludicrous or legitimate. In the end, logic takes a backseat to hate and wisdom marks a striking absence. Chat rooms, message boards, blogs, petitions, protests and e-mails generated by the Hindutva-bathed Non-Resident Indians in America burn with an angry nationalism, a hypersensitive edge and a general sense of victimhood. [..] The plight of the Kashmiri Pandits touched him deeply. Then came the BJP government in Delhi and the anger found articulation, morphing into hate speech and laying bare a distinct anti-Muslim slant. The communication revolution of the internet helped distribute the anger. But mostly the NRI rants consist of pseudo-statistics and mendacious arguments, alarmist declarations—geography is demography—and phony fears. [...] And Hindutvawalas are just a part of the larger NRI community, now 1.3 million strong. But they are noticeable because they are loud and often obnoxious.
The tactics of the Hindutva brigade can be transparently intimidating. In the 11 years of journalism in Washington, I witnessed incidents that left me wondering if the academic freedom in US varsities was being misused to spread hate. Once at the University of Maryland while attending a speech by a BJP leader, the event ended in a meltdown after a student dared to question the perfectly made-up image of India. A seething office-bearer of the Overseas Friends of the BJP was at his throat shouting, "What do you know about India?" I wrote about it in The Telegraph, earning the wrath of the saffron brigade and blacklisting from future events.
(All emphasis, mine.)
15. August 2008 - 7:27 AM
http://picasaweb.google.com/savetemples/NJIndependenceDayParade2008
http://picasaweb.google.com/umeshkaul/2008AugIndiaDayParade?authkey=mnF5Gf3GYes
Its probably this NJ rally that got ms seema sirohi all worked up. after all, dead hindus dont fit her ultra-leftist narrative right, it just doesnt sell copy writing about dead hindus.
15. August 2008 - 10:05 AM
This lady is writhing allright, but she’s hissing a lot, not moaning in ecstasy.
15. August 2008 - 11:14 AM
I suggest Seema read “Elephant Rising” by Ashutosh Seshabalaya to check her facts about INdia and NRI achievements.
15. August 2008 - 3:22 PM
Seems like Jholawalas and commies have struck again at the Hindus.
16. August 2008 - 6:48 AM
is she, ms seema, discribing this blog??
16. August 2008 - 6:52 PM
Hello Comrade Aikath,
>>is she, ms seema, discribing this blog??
I’dn’t be surprised if the nut is ranting against Sandeep’s blog, and given the levels of IQ she displayed, it’s quite conceivable that the madwoman thinks everybody who blogs is an NRI
16. August 2008 - 8:20 PM
no because i wondered. blogger did not read it whole, first sign. and she has mentioned angry nationalism, phoney fears, hypersensitvie edge, victimhood. evrything of those found in this blog and commenters. second sign. so it is natural to ask if it is this blog.
shuvro aikath, barbarindian
16. August 2008 - 9:40 PM
Comrade Aikath,
I don’t know what signs she’s sending you, but you two make a great pair. The same shrillness coupled with the same inanity. That nut seems to think sandeep is a “soldier stationed abroad”, to use words from her charming rant, and you seem to think so too. Not everybody who blogs is a an Non-Resident India, Comrade, let alone a “Hindutva-bathed” NRI, whatever that means.
Take the Dcubed blog for example. The chap who blogs there claims to live in India, and a die-hard fan of India’s Loon Numero Uno, Comrade Arundhati Roy. Get the point?
18. August 2008 - 7:18 AM
Maybe the real question is why is our friend Seema still hysterically championing the cause of 1950s Nehruvian secularism and all the “good ” it has brought India ?
26. August 2010 - 7:13 AM
Seema Sirohi, La Chingada
There will always be females who want to fornicate with “outsiders”. The appeal of the foreigner is such that some females will be willing to go to any extent to satiate their personal desires. A female will be willing to destroy herself and her people just to enable the “union”. She will feel a stronger sense of allegiance to the foreigner and his people than to her own – this is natural because her children will belong to the foreign tribe and a mother will willingly sacrifice her own parents and siblings for the benefit of her offspring. So I guess this particular kind of lust is a force of Nature. Nature probably designed us this way to ensure that there will always be exchange of genes between different gene pools. Or maybe Nature simply wanted to make sure that we will always have a reason to kill each other. Helen of Troy, after all, was the face that resulted in million butchered men.
The most well-known of these cases are Pocahontos and Dona Marina. Pocahontos brought about the collapse of Native Indian tribes whereas Dona Marina single-handedly screwed an entire civilization. What they gave the foreigner was knowledge – inside information, which is obviously the most precious things a traitor can give the enemy. We will never really know why they did it. It goes beyond what can be called “Love”. This is Nature at its criminal best.
There are a lot of Indian women who are living abroad and who have married foreigners. In this age of western imperialism, these women have become the most dangerous of all imperialist weapons. They not only arm their fornicators with inside information, but also act as their agents, spreading propaganda, and using their familiarity with Indian culture and their family tiesin India to further western interests. They tell everyone that they are bridging the gap between cultures and civilizations. But they know very well they act only in the selfish interests of their spouse, their children and their new people. History will tell you what happened to Native Indians and to the Mayan tribes. I guess all these Indian Dona Marinas want the same to happen to Indians.
The most well-known of these women are in the field of entertainment, who simply make money by selling Indian culture to their fornicators. Mira Nair, Deepa Mehta, Parminder Nagra are some of the names that come to mind. But these peddlers of ethnic porn are not as dangerous as women like Seema Sirohi who directly interfere with our policy making.
Seema Sirohi is married to a man named Christopher Sandrolini, who is a diplomat with the US foreign service according to online reports. She is also a very active, high-profile columnist for Outlook who does not consider revealing her husband’s details (professional or otherwise) as part of “full disclosure”. It is relevant here because she could be an open plant of “US Foreign Services”. Maybe her husband gets paid for articles that she writes? Maybe the articles are being written by someone else? In this article, she is openly and aggressively selling the Indo-US civil agreement:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7650286.stm
A casual reader will only see that the article was written by an Indian – it simulates the idea that Indians favour this deal. But the reader has no way of knowing that the female who wrote the article is married to a white guy who is in “US Foreign Services” and is an American in every sense of the word.
I strongly urge foreigners of Indian origin to fully state their background before commenting on Indian policy issues. If Seema Sirohi had any ethics, she would have atleast bothered to state that shes married to a foreigner. But I dont think Nature cares about ethics or morals.
P. Ram Kumar
26. August 2010 - 12:59 PM
RamKumar wrote “It is relevant here because she could be an open plant of “US Foreign Services”.”
This is a well known practice. In fact all Governments do in other countries, at least the ones they think are important. Recently I was reading on 9/11 Mosque and I came across stupid Hindus(all male) writing ridiculous news articles in some US news papers.
And other thing is Seema has a point here too. She wrote that they are trying to defend ” …… …….ludicrous or legitimate.” Now this is true. But who defines what is ludicrous or legitimate? It is very difficult to agree upon this criteria. But what I agree is that some of Indians are super sensitive. At the same time, what is written by super sensitives can not cloud what is rightful and legitimate? Most of the time this kind of crass dwarfs the real issue.
Anyway the sexist remark by P.Ram Kumar is too much.
26. August 2010 - 3:00 PM
Seema Sirohi makes special mention of comrade Biju Mathews and the Maryland-based India Development and Relief Fund, and of how Mathews and his FOIL comrades “exposed” IDRF. Here is what she says:
So, for Sirohi, Mathews and company, if Christian evangelical organizations send hundreds of billions of dollars to India for converting Hindus to Christianity it is salvation, but when these converted souls are reverted to Hinduism, its Hindu fascism. As George Orwell said, “Some animals are more equal than others”.
The “expose” that Sirohi talks of, among its numerous “assertions” claimed that since IDRF financially helped many families of firefighters who lost their lives in 9/11, it is a communal, fascist organization. Now why did she leave that out in her piece [sic]? Many readers will note that many people associated with Biju Mathews and the FOIL organization are also associated with an organization called “Fiends of South Asia”. This organization is on record sponsoring a gathering where posters such as “Allah will destroy the terrorist state of India” were displayed. (http://www.geocities.com/aid_india_info/glimpse-502.jpg). Not many people know that the supposed social service organization AID was also a party in that gathering. More on AID: http://www.aidindia.info/. The pro-Indian NRI community prepared a comprehensive report debunking the poisonous drivel on IDRF brought out by the cabal of anti-India Marxo-Stalinists. (http://www.letindiadevelop.org/thereport/)
Sirohi mentions some groups at the end of her venomous piece: Campaign to Stop Funding Hate, Friends of Indian Leftists (changed to Forum of Inqalabi Leftists) and NRIs for a Secular and Harmonious India. Couple more pioneering organizations that can be added to this illustrious list: Fiends of South Asia, South Asian Sepoy Association. Needless to say, there are many others as well.
Bharatvarsh has been cursed with people like Ambhi Kumar, Jaichand, Shiladi, Malik Kaffur, Veerbhadra Tiwari, to name only a few. Sirohi and her tribe are just more recent additions to that sadly ever growing list. Who needs a Ghazni or a Ghauri, a Babur, a Bakhtiar Khilji, or an Aurangzeb, or a Portuguese inquisitor, to name just a few, with a Seema Sirohi around.
27. August 2010 - 6:23 AM
>>>”There will always be females who want to fornicate with “outsiders”. The appeal of the foreigner is such that some females will be willing to go to any extent to satiate their personal desires. A female will be willing to destroy herself and her people just to enable the “union”. She will feel a stronger sense of allegiance to the foreigner and his people than to her own – this is natural because her children will belong to the foreign tribe and a mother will willingly sacrifice her own parents and siblings for the benefit of her offspring. So I guess this particular kind of lust is a force of Nature. Nature probably designed us this way to ensure that there will always be exchange of genes between different gene pools.”
This perspective puts it all on the physical urge for procreation; that people are motivated by their biological urges. May be the result of Freudian or such fraud western thought that views behaviour in terms of physical/biological urges.
This persepctive is the cause-result-loop of considering, classifying, painting people using a broad brush- a western characteristic.
But it overlooks numerous examples to the contrary. Padmini and thousands of women of Chittor, Laxmibhai of Jhansi, Abbakka of Tulunadu, Chennamma of Kittur, Keladi, Onake Obavva…
It also does not explain the behaviour of Jaichands and Raghavs and Chetans.
Indian traditions narrate many episodes where such narrow views are disproved. Sita, Kannaki, are examples.
Pocahontas and Dona Marina were not the only women in Americas. Millions of women fought marauding foreigners in every land, in America, Australia, Africa and India. To generalize behaviour of female gender and that of humans based on these two creatures is western mindset.
The depraved behaviour displayed by westerners (those influenced by western systems of thoughtlessness) is not the standard by which humans beings across the world are to be assessed.
Biological-physical urges are not the only motivators of humans. It is so only of depraved westerners.
In Indian tradition, the motivators are kama, artha, dharma and moksha.
Creatures such as Seema Sirohi, Arundhati, Teesta, Romila, Wendy, are not the standard by which humans or women are to be evaluated. Such creatures are aberrations, abominations, caused by western thought systems.
Possibilities of humane achievements transcend the narrow bounds of western systems.
dhanyavaad