Comments on: Vir Sanghvi’s Missionary Position

By: Arya

Arya — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 11:35:54 +0000

People like Vir Sanhvi have licked feet of politicians and westerners to come to the stage where they stand today. It is a shame that it mainly the people of India (esp. the powerful ones) that have given idiots like Sanghvi many chances to spread insane ideas.

Everyone knows the mission of the Christian missionaries — Conversion. And conversion of religion is the same as change of nationality (Swami Vivekananda). How much has Sanghvi (dog of Congress) written about the British atrocities against Indians? Has he ever owned come up with the notion of “biased media” in India? Why can’t he ever praise Hindu religion or achievements of our ancestors?

I studied in an elite Chrisitan school (Bishop Cotton School, Shimla) fro 9 years, and over there we were forced to follow Christians beliefs, visit the Chapel on weekdays for 30 minutes everyday. Why the hell he never writes about these schools? We were beaten up from the age of 5 years for not speaking in English. No one cares to report that. Media of India sucks and is the foremost institution of corruption.

By: Ajay

Ajay — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 10:21:59 +0000

It is precisely Hindus like Sanghvi that have let things go as far as they have gone in India. Its ok for other religions to convert Hindus as they are minorities but the reverse (which in my view has never been documented) is intolerable. Thanks to the vote bank politics of parties that have led the country for the most part of its free life.

Way to go!

By: Rama Krishnan

Rama Krishnan — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 02:28:31 +0000

Dear Shuvro Aitkath
Conversion is the root cause of all problems. If you are not aware of this, then you must have landed on this earth recently from another palnet.As someone has said,the right to religious freedom enunciated in the constitution should not be misunderstood as a right to convert others.

Conversion is a worst form of violence. Conversion interferes with an individualâ€™s right to continue and practise his own natural religion.

Conversion disturbs a peaceful land and peace loving people and brings social disorder. Whatever happened to the native culture of Europe? South America? Australia?
Ban relegious conversion, I say.

By: Rapid Fire

Rapid Fire — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:54:57 +0000

“plz dont try too hard to defend ur Hindu fanatic antics?”

Fanatics are those who claim “our God is true, your God is false” and then proceed to condemn unbelievers to hell fire or burn them on the stake. That is what fanaticism is all about. We don’t want these kind of “religions” in India. Spare us the love that you have been spreading throughout the world, from Red Indians to Goan Hindus to Rwandans.

By: Guardian

Guardian — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:16:51 +0000

Mr. Sandeep, do u think Vir Sanghvi”s article is able to explain or even write everything bout the hindu mythology or conversion or watever as refuted by you?
plz dont try too hard to defend ur Hindu fanatic antics? just rem’ wats happening against the christians in india is NOT right. no matter how hard u try, truth will always prevail and justice will be done in the eyes of our Almighty God!

By: Ot

Ot — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 10:44:58 +0000

>>hindus are not weak.

You ought to know, Comrade Aikath, you ought to know. True, Hindus are not weak, but I don’t say stuff to you burn your bottom (I actually kind of like commie catholics) so never be afraid to repeat what I said.

By: Ot

Ot — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 10:33:47 +0000

Comrade Aikath,

You sound like a cubed out commie to me. Because …

>>tushar asked â€œPray tell, how do you define â€œproselytizingâ€?â€

>>shri ot replys â€œI donâ€™t know, and I donâ€™t have to know.â€

… it’s the technique of cubed out commies to strip statements of context. Shri OT also said:

“Iâ€™ll leave that to legal experts. Lay people can name and identify phenomena, activities etc, but defining them in the context of a legal framework is the job of legal experts.”

Did those couple sentences scorch your bottom, Comrade Aikath, since you seem afraid to mention them?

By: Shuvro Aikath

Shuvro Aikath — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 03:35:59 +0000

>>Lots of people? Like Aikath, Saxena, Dhusakar Nair, Jahnavi, Mridula, Balaji, Rama Rao, Soma Rao, Squared Off, Cubed Out, Amit, Nikhil, Chorakkot etc, etc?

mebbe them. others too. also RR, raghu redy, oh i forgot thats you anyway??

>>Let me know whatâ€™s your problem with it.

shri ot said “Conversion doesnâ€™t have to be banned. Proselytism has to be.”

tushar asked “Pray tell, how do you define â€œproselytizingâ€?”

shri ot replys “I donâ€™t know, and I donâ€™t have to know.”

so shri ot wants to ban sthg that he cant define. shri ot never will answer any qustion.

>>And as to hindus being weak and converting for a bag of rice,

hindus are not weak. but owner of this site and his readers they want to make hinduism *appear* as to be weak andd frightened. maybe becoz they are like that only.

By: kaafir

kaafir — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:59:47 +0000

I believe Mr. Saxena is probably coming to this issue from an Objectivist perspective, rather than the “Comrade” one.

By: Raghu

Raghu — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:28:39 +0000

This is interesting now.. :

Cong MP suspected behind VHP leader’s murder

http://indiatoday.digitaltoday.in/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=17911§ionid=4&issueid=75&Itemid=1