The Ghost of Censorship is Back
Thursday, 28. May 2009 - 2:57 AM
The ghastly ghost of Nehru’s unsullied love for Stalinist Russia continues to haunt us. His intolerance to criticism spilled over to the next generation culminating in the Emergency. While Nehru at least concealed his intolerance under a carefully-cultivated outward sophistication, his daughter was quite frank in showing her sense of entitlement to rule India.
The Congress footsoldiers were quick to pick that up. The servility they displayed during Indira Gandhi’s time set a precedent that continues to date. For most of the post-Rajiv Gandhi era, the Congress party’s fortunes looked like it was headed for bankruptcy. And despite its familiar noises, people had stopped taking it seriously.
Its fortunes are pointing heavenwards again. And it’s now trying to resuscitate its inheritance of intolerance for all norms of healthy opposition, dissent and basic norms of democratic decency. The latest Exhibit :
Barely four months after dropping its proposal of forcing TV channels to show only an “authorized” feed during security emergencies, the government is now seeking to censor news portals and other websites, that too even at normal times.
One glaring infirmity in the draft rules prepared by the department of information technology is that they make no stipulation for a prior hearing to the affected website. This is despite the fact that the web host who does not comply with the direction to remove the offending information is liable to be punished with imprisonment up to seven years. … Under the draft rules framed under section 69A of the IT amendment Act, every state or Central government department will be empowered to decide whether a certain news item, article, blog or advertisement relating to its jurisdiction is safe to remain on the Net.
Once somebody sends a “complaint” against any information displayed on the Net, the department concerned will take a call on whether the matter in question affects any of the six concerns mentioned in section 69A: interest of sovereignty or integrity of India, defence of India, security of the state, friendly relations with foreign states, public order or incitement to commit any cognizable offence relating to the other five reasons.
Stealth Stalinism in plain language.
Woe must’ve befallen me that this damn piece of news was reported on my birthday [I'm not fishing for anything okay?
].
This is eerily reminiscient of the days of a Indira Gandhi-appointed “news censor.” But Congress 2009 is a completely different beast. It looks like it has partially learned some lessons from its fall from the heady days where it commanded upward of two-thirds majority. This time around, notice how this proposal was passed surreptitiously? Not too many people–even the media–have written about/reported it. It’s understandable that the secular media is overworked from spinning tales of the triumph of secularism over dangerous communalism etc. Which perfectly suits–and I suspect is also part of–the Congress strategy. Recall in my previous I’d complimented the Congress party for quashing its political opponents once it’s in power. If you notice, it put a rubber-stamp non-entity in the Rashtrapati Bhavan and winked at the media. The media promptly painted her as a symbol of female empowerment, etc. Then it put its reliable Emergency Lieutenant, Navin Chawla in the Election office. All along it doled out goodies to the media, kept it well-oiled and now that it is unchallenged in sheer numbers, it has begun to slowly slip such Stalinist envelopes under the door.
However, unlike the days of print media, trying to censor online media is really, a double-edged sword: one, you cannot really “censor” the Internet. Two, when this comes up for more detailed discussion, it will generate widespread outrage across the world. Recall the public outcry when it blocked Blogspot and several other “offensive” sites? We’ll see how that’ll unfold but this disgraceful move underscores what I observed earlier: the Congress party by nature suffers from insufferable megalomania and an acute intolerance for democratic norms.
PS: Read this blog while it lasts: it maybe banned.
Tags: 15th Lok Sabha, Blogs, Censorship in Democracy, Congress, Congress Master Censor, Congress wants to Censor News Portals, Dynastic Rule, Elections 2009, India, Indian Elections 2009, Indian Politics, Indian Polls 2009, Intolerance, Media Watch, Politics, UPA

28. May 2009 - 9:10 AM
Yes, I agree. Congress culture is quite alien to democracy and it remains as long as its a family business. People failed to punish congress hence people rightly deserve the Stalinist regime.
Internet was boon for all those who wants to raise voice against falsehood. They can’t bribe very blogger and not everyone is sold, so they use constitutional power to shut every opposition.
Mogals, British and now congress, freedom is long way to come.
May God bless India.
28. May 2009 - 3:32 PM
Sandeep, please write freely. We all must. If reprisals come, let them come. It will be a cleansing process when we fight back.
28. May 2009 - 3:50 PM
The media going to bed with Government has long term implications for democratic health of the nation.
As their hold on media is almost complete, they have now turned to Internet, which unfortunately cannot be bribed. Hence the need for a “law” to get rid of pesky bloggers!
Looks like this fight has just began.
28. May 2009 - 4:03 PM
Happy birthday, Sandeep.
And btw, the censorship will not work. As you said, censoring the internet is a fool’s errand.
28. May 2009 - 4:26 PM
I am just waiting for the day when the ELM and congress have a ‘difference of opinion’ and start killing each other.
28. May 2009 - 4:53 PM
Laws in India are designed to make everyone a criminal, so that people cant speak up against the government as anyone who speaks up, they will find something to prosecute them with. For eg. Tehelka founders
Luckily the legal system has been corrupted to an extent that most cases cant end in prosecution, at least in the lifetime of the defendant. For eg. Kasab… open and shut case… where are we now?
29. May 2009 - 2:04 AM
@Sandeep: I hope you are keeping a backup of everything you write. If indeed this site is banned, it shouldn’t be difficult to recreate another one (as long as your previous articles are there, it won’t be too difficult to know).
29. May 2009 - 4:27 PM
I do think the censorship is aimed at internet. The government has nothing to fear from TV or print — most of the media is its bootlicker anyway.
As Atanu said, censoring the internet is not easy. However it _will_ force bloggers to adopt indirect methods of publishing that they might otherwise not prefer.
30. May 2009 - 6:07 PM
There is hardly anything they are able to do to handle the Chinese hackers where will these jokers have time to think about all these things?
2. June 2009 - 10:33 AM
I am your long-time reader, Sandeep.
Also take time to read my website: http://www.greathindu.com
Awaiting your comments too. Like the piece on Romila Thapar BS.
3. June 2009 - 1:26 AM
Deepak Kamat,
Thanks for dropping by. Your blog is pretty timely and passionate.
3. June 2009 - 10:14 AM
Hi Sandeep, Happy Birth Day.
As for Congress and it’s insecurities always lead to censorship be it Desi Mrs. Gandhi or imported Mrs. Gandhi. ELM or MSM (as I prefer to call)have suffered serious credibility quotient. Censor them or not – is no issue as they (MSM) are willing to crawl on their own.
Now censoring Internet is laughable. But yes, bloggers could or probably will be targeted by the dynasty foot licker’s to prove selves more loyal than King.This certainly is a possibility after all not long ago Barkha Didi managed to extract an apology.
Anyway this reminds me of a Sher
“Waqt aane pe bata denge; Tughe A Aasman’
Hum Abhi Se Kaya Bateyen; Kaya hamere dil Mein hai”
We bloggers defied earlier ban and shall defy each time it is imposed.
Regards,
PI