Comments on: Put the %@%! Kafirs in Their Place! http://www.sandeepweb.com/2009/06/08/put-the-kafirs-in-their-place/ Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:23:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: sharmajee http://www.sandeepweb.com/2009/06/08/put-the-kafirs-in-their-place/comment-page-1/#comment-316917 sharmajee Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:04:25 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2009/06/08/put-the-kafirs-in-their-place/#comment-316917 A propos the notion that "pretty much everyone killed the Jews in Europe from the beginning of history," let's not oversimplify, even if only to illustrate the monstrosity of crazy Adolf. For example in Russia, Queen Katherine refused to yield to the pressure to expel or exterminate Jews. Instead, she recognized their immense value to (her) society and merely put geographic boundaries on where they can live freely and without fear. The so-called "Jewish Pale" earned her some kindness of history, Katherine the Great, not unlike Akbar Padsha. The degrees of venality notwithstanding, Hindus in particular and Indians in general, are better off with a wider acceptance of historical facts of the legacy of their wretched treatment by the Muslims rather than wallow in the mumbo-jumbo of "ancient Indian glory." V.S. Naipaul said it best, "Men who are nothing, who allow themselves to become nothing, have no place in this world." I am afraid, the Hindus are racing headlong toward such ignominy, in their own homeland, that too. A propos the notion that “pretty much everyone killed the Jews in Europe from the beginning of history,” let’s not oversimplify, even if only to illustrate the monstrosity of crazy Adolf. For example in Russia, Queen Katherine refused to yield to the pressure to expel or exterminate Jews. Instead, she recognized their immense value to (her) society and merely put geographic boundaries on where they can live freely and without fear. The so-called “Jewish Pale” earned her some kindness of history, Katherine the Great, not unlike Akbar Padsha.

The degrees of venality notwithstanding, Hindus in particular and Indians in general, are better off with a wider acceptance of historical facts of the legacy of their wretched treatment by the Muslims rather than wallow in the mumbo-jumbo of “ancient Indian glory.”

V.S. Naipaul said it best, “Men who are nothing, who allow themselves to become nothing, have no place in this world.” I am afraid, the Hindus are racing headlong toward such ignominy, in their own homeland, that too.

]]> By: Bhavananda http://www.sandeepweb.com/2009/06/08/put-the-kafirs-in-their-place/comment-page-1/#comment-314458 Bhavananda Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:28:13 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2009/06/08/put-the-kafirs-in-their-place/#comment-314458 No, Alamgir merely "restarted" the jiziya which was always there from the Sultanate times, except the brief period of Akbar (which earned him "Akbar the great" title). The link is probably to denote the recency and ruthlessness of the monster. For example, pretty much everyone killed the Jews in Europe from the beginning of history. But Hitler is the arch anti-semite, for similar reasons of recency and monstrosity. No, Alamgir merely “restarted” the jiziya which was always there from the Sultanate times, except the brief period of Akbar (which earned him “Akbar the great” title). The link is probably to denote the recency and ruthlessness of the monster. For example, pretty much everyone killed the Jews in Europe from the beginning of history. But Hitler is the arch anti-semite, for similar reasons of recency and monstrosity.

]]> By: Palahalli http://www.sandeepweb.com/2009/06/08/put-the-kafirs-in-their-place/comment-page-1/#comment-314450 Palahalli Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:52:34 +0000 http://www.sandeepweb.com/2009/06/08/put-the-kafirs-in-their-place/#comment-314450 But why link it to Aurangzeb? Was the jazia his innovation? But why link it to Aurangzeb? Was the jazia his innovation?

]]>