The only people who’d be happy with that are Islamist/Jihadi men, like you find in AfPak or the Saudis. Plus, it will only increase the suffering of their women.. The bigger problem will be with the non-Muslims because INVARIABLY the demands won’t stop will implementation of Sharia - it will only legitimize the jihadi wetdream of a worldwide Islamic rule.
Feeding a snake only produces poison, no nectar is ever formed.

The only thing I propose is to give Muslims their Islamic Shar’ia. Let them experience their religion in its entire splendor. Why should we refuse them that? Even though it’s the Secular State that does the refusing now.

Books will be availabe in
Keshava Shilpa, Near Uma Theatre, Chamrajpete
Keshava Shilpa, Rangarao Road, Shankar Puram
Sapna Book House

Please go through the Catalogue
http://www.dravidianuniversity.org/downloads/New_Catalogue.pdf

Since the punishment for heretics and apostates is death (and it’s the duty of any Muslim to punish a heretic/apostate), that should be more than enough force to keep Muslims within the fold. It even keeps lefty non-Muslims deferential to Islam to the extent that they don’t even criticize it - they are not stupid, and they’re not blind to what happened to Theo van Gogh, Taslima Nasreen, Rushdie etc. and what happened after the Danish cartoons were published.

- To me this is not clarity but confusion confounded. Root of most if not all of our miseries.

1. Are we (presumably “Indian” Society) a Secular community?

2. How does this Secular community “restrict the role” of religion to the private domain?

3. If this Secular community sees religion “infesting” its public domain, then how is this Secular community comfortable investing its private domain with such “infestation”?

Shortly, are Secular-liberals not trying to misguide the religious by telling them there is a way to restrict religion to the private domain when they actually want to to tell them that they should throw religion out altogether?

So when I support the right of the Muslima to wear the veil, I think I’m being honest to her need of her religion. This need is obvious because she has not converted out of it. We also delude ourselves repeatedly by assuming that some large evil force holds Muslims in thrall of Islam. They are scared to convert et al. Maybe it’s true of some. Certainly not of the majority.

In India the State is Secular and not Hindu.

Nevertheless when in conflict with the State, Muslims and Christians rarely recognize it as such and they then see a *Hindu State* instead. - Why should Hindus bear the brunt of decisions made by the Secular State or its courts of law that actually, vehemently deny any Hindu character in its institutions?

So my own position is that Muslims must be allowed to live as Muslims and by their laws.

There is really no way a child of 7th or 8th standard can remember or even show an interest in so much content being dumped over him/her in just one academic year without any emphasis on why it is important to study history.

In contrast, I was irritated to see that Otto Von Bismarck was eulogised as “a tall blond man of Prussia with a heavy moustache” and paens were sung for his “blood and iron” policy, during his drive to unify Germany for his Prussian King Wilhelm II become the emperor of Germany!

That, my friends, is the scholarship of SSC (Secondary School Certificate) of A.P. (when I studied, atleast!)